Nijmegen

Digital Political Epistemology Conference

POSTPONED UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE
Radboud University
Nijmegen, The Netherlands

1ed191cfbc4875cf72aa5456bb38d3c1.jpg
 
 

Keynote Speakers

Regina Rini, York University

Annette Zimmerman, Princeton University

 
 

CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS

 

We invite submissions of abstracts (700-1000 words) or full papers on any topic on the theme of the conference.

Please anonymize your submission and email it to f.jongepier@ftr.ru.nl, with an email subject line: "Digital Political Epistemology submission."

The deadline is POSTPONTED UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE. We will send out another call for submissions when we reschedule the event.

We are able to provide two nights accommodation for speakers selected through our open call, but speakers must pay for their own travel. We will also provide a conference dinner, lunch, and refreshments throughout the conference.

 
 

Conference Theme

More than half of humanity is now online. This is one of the biggest societal shifts in history. But what effects do new digital technologies have on democracy? The Internet was initially hailed as democratizing information and promising to make citizens more informed about politics. Cyberspace provided a robust forum for political debate and would allow citizens to discuss and disseminate political information. However, our digital environment has led to the spread of misinformation, the creation of new echo chambers, and the proliferation propaganda.

The promise and problems of digital technology raise important questions in the political sphere. For example, what is the role and responsibility of platforms such as YouTube with respect to individuals’ belief in conspiracy theories and other ‘epistemic vices’? Is microtargeting genuinely effective and if so, problematic? Do algorithms know us better than we know ourselves? Is the growing knowledge asymmetry between corporations and citizens unjust, and if so, why? To what extent do legal regulations such as having a “right to explanation” form an effective remedy to counterbalance such asymmetries? What does it mean to treat algorithms as “experts”, e.g. in medical contexts, and is this the same or a different notion of expertise that we use to describe human professionals?

This conference aims to bring together researchers working in ‘digital political epistemology’. We are especially interested in the study of how digital technologies (broadly construed to include platforms, recommender systems, algorithms, profiling technologies, etc.) play a role – positively or negatively – in the creation and dissemination of political knowledge.

 
 

Organizers

Fleur Jongepier (Radboud) & Michael Hannon (Nottingham)

 

The conference is sponsored by

The Faculty of Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies of the Radboud University Nijmegen; Radboud’s interdisciplinary research center iHub; the NWO research project (Veni) ‘Do algorithms know better?’ and Radboud’s Practical Philosophy Department.

 
 
ihub.png
nwo.png